RebrandAgenciesThe rebrand directory
2026 edition · Independent directory

The 15 Best Rebranding Agencies (2026)

A rebrand that stops at the logo is unfinished. The identity now has to survive a product interface, a sales deck, a procurement review and every screen a customer actually touches — and firms differ enormously in how far down that chain they can go.

Each entry below says what a firm genuinely covers, who owns it, roughly what it costs, and who should not hire it.

Best for

Start here

Find the shortlist for your situation

Pick the brief closest to yours. Each list points to the firms below that are built for it — nothing here is ranked by a made-up score.

The 15

Full profiles

What each firm actually does

01
Clay Global logo

Clay Global

Best for rebrands where the product carries as much of the brand as the marketing does.

Most branding firms hand over an identity system and leave the product team to interpret it, which is where rebrands quietly fail. Clay treats brand and digital product as one engagement, so the identity arrives already resolved into an interface. That matters most for technology companies, and the portfolio reflects it, with legacy enterprise software rebuilds for ADP, VMware and Cisco alongside scale-up work for Coinbase and Uber. Headquartered in San Francisco with offices in New York, Austin, Denver, Lisbon and Belgrade, and co-founders leading the teams rather than handing off after the pitch. Depth sits in B2B, SaaS, AI and fintech.

Website
clay.global
Clients
ADP, VMware, Cisco, Coinbase, Uber, Slack, Marqeta, Credit Karma.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, marketing site, product interface, development.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You want packaging, retail environments or FMCG shelf work.
02
Pentagram logo

Pentagram

Best for identity work that has to hold up for twenty years.

The largest independent design consultancy in the world, run on a partner model where each partner owns their team and their client relationships, so the person who pitches is the person who designs. That structure is the reason the work ages well, and it is also the constraint, because you are buying a specific partner's availability rather than an agency's capacity. Breadth runs across identity, strategy, packaging, digital, communications and motion. The restraint in the output is the point. Pentagram can be loud and usually chooses clarity.

Website
pentagram.com
Clients
Long-standing work across culture, publishing, technology and consumer brands.
Covers
Identity, strategy, packaging, digital, environmental, editorial.
Ownership
Independent, partner-owned.
Skip if
You are fast-moving and early-stage. The cost profile and pace suit neither.
03
COLLINS logo

COLLINS

Best for companies at an inflection point where the brand question is really a business question.

Ad Age named this firm Design Agency of the Year six times between 2019 and 2025, which is the most consistent recognition anyone in the category holds. Founded in 2007 by Brian Collins and Leland Maschmeyer, based in Brooklyn with a San Francisco studio, and describing itself as a transformation consultancy rather than a design firm. The distinction shows in the work, which tends to arrive when a company is launching a new category, repositioning against a threat or expanding into unfamiliar territory. Strategy, identity, motion and experience are handled as one thing rather than sequenced.

Website
wearecollins.com
Clients
Spotify, Twitch, Dropbox, Target, Google, Coca-Cola, NBCUniversal.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, motion, experience design.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
Your budget is below six figures. The typical range runs $75,000 to $250,000.
04
Focus Lab logo

Focus Lab

Best for B2B and software rebrands that have to survive an enterprise sales cycle.

The most specialised firm here and treated across G2 reviews as the default choice for technology rebrands rather than one option among several, with multiple chief executives saying the specialisation decided it even after a formal RFP. Founded 2010 in Savannah. The method is strictly sequenced, with no visual work starting until positioning, messaging and brand architecture are resolved, which is slower and produces brands that hold up in procurement. A named Structural Rebrand engagement exists specifically for companies going through a full rebrand, merger or acquisition, and pricing is unusually transparent for the category.

Website
focuslab.agency
Clients
Marketo, Braze, Outreach, Udacity, Calendly, Aptible, Voiceflow.
Covers
Brand strategy, verbal and visual identity, naming, website.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You need product interface work or packaging. This is branding-first.
05
Jones Knowles Ritchie logo

Jones Knowles Ritchie

Best for consumer brands whose identity is judged on a shelf in three seconds.

The Burger King rebrand collected more than fifty international design awards and is routinely cited as one of the most effective identity redesigns of the past decade, notably because it has been maintained without significant modification since launch. Founded 1990 in London with offices in New York, Singapore and Shanghai. The specialism is commercial distinctiveness in high-competition retail, balancing heritage against contemporary relevance, and the portfolio is heavy with names evaluated daily by millions of shoppers.

Website
jkrglobal.com
Clients
Burger King, Budweiser, Heinz, Coca-Cola, Cadbury, Dulux, Häagen-Dazs.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, packaging, naming.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You are B2B software. The muscle here is consumer and FMCG.
06
Koto logo

Koto

Best for technology brands that need to work as a system across dozens of surfaces.

Five studios across London, Berlin, Los Angeles, New York and Sydney, and a client list weighted toward companies where the brand has to flex across product, marketing, hardware and partnerships at once. Microsoft Copilot+ PC, Google Fitbit, Revolut, Headspace, Sonos, Airbnb and Discord all sit in the portfolio. The output tends toward warmth and clarity rather than provocation, and the systems are built to be handed over and extended by internal teams, which matters when the rollout will take a year.

Website
koto.studio
Clients
Microsoft, Google, Revolut, Headspace, Sonos, Airbnb, Discord, Coca-Cola.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, digital, motion, packaging.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You want a small team in one timezone. This is a global studio network.
07
Wolff Olins logo

Wolff Olins

Best for reinvention that is meant to provoke a reaction.

A stated point of view that brands should disrupt rather than fit in, and a portfolio to back it including Tate, (RED) and Yelp. That makes it the right call when a leadership team genuinely wants to change how the market sees them and the wrong one when the goal is to look safe. Note the ownership carefully. Following Omnicom's acquisition of Interpublic, completed in November 2025, Wolff Olins now sits inside Omnicom Branding alongside Interbrand, Siegel+Gale and Sterling Brands, all reporting to one divisional chief executive.

Website
wolffolins.com
Clients
Tate, (RED), Yelp, and large-scale corporate transformations.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, naming, activation.
Ownership
Omnicom Branding, since November 2025.
Skip if
You are in a regulated category where standing out reads as risk.
08
Red Antler logo

Red Antler

Best for venture-backed consumer launches and challenger positioning.

Close to synonymous with startup branding, and the reason is a run of consumer companies that defined a category on arrival rather than growing into one. Founded 2007 in Dumbo, Brooklyn. The approach treats design and language as tools for a strategic problem, with one core idea carried from positioning through packaging, which is why the work reads as coherent rather than assembled. Casper, Allbirds, Hims, Rent the Runway and Folx are the reference points. Strongest when you are genuinely disrupting a category and weakest when you are not.

Website
redantler.com
Clients
Casper, Allbirds, Hims, Folx, Rent the Runway, Vevo.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, naming, packaging, digital.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You are enterprise B2B. The instincts here are consumer.
09
Motto logo

Motto

Best for growth-stage companies that want to buy only the part they need.

The engagement model is the differentiator and it is genuinely unusual. Three tiers, running from strategy and positioning alone, through strategy plus visual identity, to a full build including activation. For a company that already has a clear position and needs only the identity, or the reverse, that removes a lot of paid-for work nobody asked for. The natural moment is a Series B raise, a market expansion or a rebrand following a pivot. Google Merchandise Store and Goodnotes are among the named rebrands.

Website
wearemotto.com
Clients
Google Merchandise Store, Goodnotes, Bandana.
Covers
Brand strategy, positioning, visual identity, activation.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You need assets on a short deadline. The full engagement takes time.
10
Mission Control logo

Mission Control

Best for funded startups that want a brand launch with the price fixed upfront.

Founded 2025, under fifty people, senior-led, with creative leadership in San Francisco and an asynchronous team. Launchpad is the relevant offer, a fixed-fee brand launch for companies that need to look real to their first serious customers and their first institutional investors. Two other shapes exist, an ongoing retainer called Orbit and an equity or hybrid arrangement called Alliance, and the last is worth asking about because very few studios will hold part of their fee in your company. The trade is a short public record.

Website
missioncontrol.co
Clients
Early roster, not widely published.
Covers
Brand launch, identity, marketing site, product.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
A board wants a decade of case studies before approving a vendor.
11
Interbrand logo

Interbrand

Best for multinational rebrands that need governance across dozens of markets.

More than forty offices across twenty-five countries, and a research and valuation methodology that gives finance and legal something to hold onto when a rebrand has to be justified upward. That is the real reason to shortlist them, because at multinational scale the hard part is not the identity but the rollout, the naming architecture and the internal alignment across regions. Founded 1974 and acquired by Omnicom in 1993, the firm now sits inside Omnicom Branding following the Interpublic acquisition.

Website
interbrand.com
Clients
Global corporate brands across technology, automotive, financial services and consumer.
Covers
Brand strategy, valuation, architecture, identity, naming, rollout.
Ownership
Omnicom Branding.
Skip if
You want distinctive creative above all. The strength is rigour and scale.
12
Chermayeff & Geismar & Haviv logo

Chermayeff & Geismar & Haviv

Best for a mark that has to last decades rather than a cycle.

The NBC peacock, the Chase octagon, the Showtime logo and the Mobil wordmark all came from this firm, which has been working on trademarks and identity programmes since 1957 and remains independent in New York. The practice is narrow by choice. This is where you go when the single most important deliverable is the mark itself, and the discipline of reducing an organisation to one durable symbol is the entire craft. Not a full-service brand consultancy and it does not pretend to be.

Website
cghnyc.com
Clients
NBC, Chase, Showtime, Warner Bros, Mobil, and long-running institutional identities.
Covers
Trademarks, identity programmes, symbol design.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
You need positioning, messaging or brand architecture work alongside it.
13
Moving Brands logo

Moving Brands

Best for identities built to move before they are built to sit still.

Motion is treated as a primary design consideration rather than something added at the end, which matters more each year as brands are experienced first on a screen and in an app rather than on a page. Global studios, with strategy carried through to implementation rather than handed over at the guidelines stage. Netflix, BBC and Salesforce are the reference points, all organisations whose identity has to perform across broadcast, product and interface simultaneously.

Website
movingbrands.com
Clients
Netflix, BBC, Salesforce.
Covers
Brand strategy, identity, motion, digital, implementation.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
Your brand lives mainly in print and physical retail.
14
basement.studio logo

basement.studio

Best for developer tools and AI companies where the brand has to earn respect from engineers.

Vercel, Linear, Cursor, Harvey, Scale, Replicate and Baseten are the reference points, and for a technical audience that roster carries more weight than any award. Founded 2018 in Mar del Plata, Argentina, now around forty people run by Facundo Santana and José Rago. The Vercel relationship has run over five years and produced the Geist typeface and work on the Next.js identity. An internal R&D lab has released an open source framework and a headless CMS, so the credibility with an engineering audience is demonstrable rather than asserted.

Website
basement.studio
Clients
Vercel, Linear, Cursor, Harvey, Scale, Replicate, Apollo GraphQL, Baseten.
Covers
Brand, marketing sites, digital experiences, custom type.
Ownership
Independent.
Skip if
Your audience is not technical. The instincts are tuned to one crowd.
15
Siegel+Gale logo

Siegel+Gale

Best for simplifying an organisation that has become impossible to explain.

The whole proposition is simplicity, applied to companies whose products, naming and messaging have accumulated into something customers cannot navigate. That makes it well suited to financial services, healthcare, insurance and large institutional brands where complexity is the actual problem and a new logo would not touch it. Now inside Omnicom Branding following the Interpublic acquisition, alongside Interbrand, Wolff Olins and Sterling Brands.

Website
siegelgale.com
Clients
Large financial services, healthcare and institutional organisations.
Covers
Brand strategy, architecture, naming, verbal identity, experience.
Ownership
Omnicom Branding.
Skip if
You want expressive creative. The discipline here is clarity and reduction.
Compare

Side by side

The 15, on the facts that decide a shortlist

Specialism, focus and operating model — the things that actually change who gets assigned and what you pay. No ratings, because a rebrand fit is not a leaderboard.

AgencyBest forSpecialismBase & model
Clay GlobalProduct-led rebrandsB2B, SaaS, AI, fintechSan Francisco · +5 offices
PentagramIdentity built to lastBroad, partner-ledLondon / New York
COLLINSInflection-point brandsStrategy + designBrooklyn / San Francisco
Focus LabEnterprise-ready B2BB2B softwareSavannah
Jones Knowles RitchieShelf distinctivenessConsumer / FMCGLondon · +3 offices
KotoBrand as a systemTechnology5 studios, global
Wolff OlinsProvocative reinventionCorporate transformationGlobal
Red AntlerChallenger launchesConsumer startupsBrooklyn
MottoBuy only what you needGrowth-stageDistributed · 3 tiers
Mission ControlFixed-fee launchFunded startupsSan Francisco · async
InterbrandMulti-market governanceEnterprise scale40+ offices, 25 countries
Chermayeff & Geismar & HavivEnduring marksSymbol designNew York
Moving BrandsMotion-first identityTechnology / mediaGlobal studios
basement.studioDeveloper-tool brandsDev tools / AIMar del Plata · ~40 people
Siegel+GaleRadical simplificationComplex institutionsGlobal
Budget

What it costs

What a rebrand actually costs

Ranges vary by a factor of eighty across this category, so scope before you shop.

Identity refresh
$3k–$15k
3 to 6 weeks

A modernised mark, palette and type with updated guidelines. Higher with a name firm.

Full rebrand · growth-stage
$40k–$150k
8 to 12 weeks

Positioning, messaging, visual identity, guidelines and a website, handled together.

Enterprise · multi-market
$150k–$250k+
4 to 8 months

Adds naming architecture, internal alignment, governance and rollout across regions.

The number that surprises people is implementation. Signage, packaging, templates, product interfaces, legal filings and market-by-market rollout routinely cost more than the design work — and agencies quote the design work.

Scope

Know which one you are buying

Rebrand, refresh, or reposition

Three different projects, often confused, and buying the wrong one wastes both money and a year.

A refresh

Updates how you look without changing what you claim. Right when the business is working and the visual language has aged.

A rebrand

Changes how you look and what you say, usually after a pivot, merger, acquisition or a move upmarket. This is the bulk of the work on this page.

A repositioning

Changes what you claim and to whom, and may not change the logo at all. It is a strategy engagement first — Siegel+Gale, Motto and Focus Lab will tell you when that is what you actually need.

If your leadership team cannot agree which of the three you are doing, that disagreement is the first thing any good agency will surface, and it is cheaper to resolve before the pitch than after.

FAQ

Before you brief anyone

Frequently asked questions

How long does a rebrand take?

Three to six weeks for a refresh. Eight to twelve weeks for a full rebrand at growth stage. Four to eight months for a multinational rollout. Anything promised faster is either smaller than you described or skipping the alignment work that makes a rebrand stick internally.

Should we use a specialist or a generalist?

A specialist when the category has its own rules, which is true of B2B software, FMCG packaging and regulated industries. A generalist when the challenge is broad and the audience is mixed. Focus Lab for software and Jones Knowles Ritchie for consumer goods are the clearest examples of specialisation paying for itself.

Does the agency's ownership matter?

Yes, more than most buyers expect. It affects who is assigned to your account, how fast they can start, what they charge and whether they can turn down a brief. It does not reliably change craft quality, which is why it belongs in your evaluation rather than at the top of it.

How do we handle a rebrand's effect on search visibility?

Plan it before launch, not after. Domain changes, redirects, structured data, and updating third-party listings and knowledge panels all take longer than the design and are routinely left to the last week. Ask any candidate who owns this in their scope, because many assume you do.

What if leadership cannot agree on the direction?

That is normal and it is a large part of what you are paying for. Strategy-led firms surface the disagreement early and force a decision. Firms that start on visuals will produce work that gets rejected for reasons nobody can articulate, three rounds in.

Will a rebrand lose us existing customers?

Some confusion is unavoidable and it is manageable with a transition period, clear communication and a phased rollout. The failures are usually the ones executed silently, where customers discover the change rather than being told.

Can one agency do the brand and the product interface?

Some can, and when both need to move together it saves a coordination problem larger than it looks. Clay, Koto, basement.studio and Mission Control all run both. Be sceptical of firms listing every service without depth in any, and ask to see a project where both were delivered by the same team.

What should we have ready before the first call?

Why you are rebranding and what would count as success, whatever customer or market research you hold, your realistic budget including implementation, your deadline and what it is tied to, and the names of everyone who can veto the work. That last one saves more time than the rest combined.